HLTH 4913 Module 1 Capstone Problem Proposal Example

Reviewed by Cornelius Ravenhill, MBA · American College of Education · Updated

This HLTH 4913 Module 1 example is a complete capstone problem proposal, written in APA 7, on missed follow-up visits after heart failure discharge at a composite 240-bed community hospital. It was prepared for American College of Education HLTH 4913, Senior Capstone Experience: Healthcare Administration, the final HLTH4913 course in ACE's B.S. in Healthcare Administration. Only 41% of about 760 patients sent home each year were seen within seven days, readmissions ran at 23.8%, and a third of patients reached by phone said they had no ride. The paper frames significance three ways: Hernandez's study of 30,136 Medicare patients and Syed's review of transport barriers for patients, the CMS readmissions penalty for the hospital, and unused Medicaid and Medicare Advantage ride benefits for the county. Scope, stakeholders and three questions follow. You typically pick the problem.

CourseHLTH 4913 Senior Capstone Experience: Healthcare Administration
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeCapstone problem proposal
Length1,180 words, about 4 pages plus title and reference pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAmerican College of Education
ProgramB.S. in Healthcare Administration
UpdatedSeptember 2026

Free sample paper for HLTH 4913 Module 1

1

Forty-One Percent Seen Within a Week: A Capstone Problem Proposal on Missed Follow-Up Visits After Heart Failure Discharge and the Rides Behind Them

Student Name

American College of Education

HLTH4913: Senior Capstone Experience: Healthcare Administration

Module 1 Assignment

Instructor Name

October 5, 2026

What this page is doingThe title states the performance gap as a number and names the suspected cause, which tells the grader the capstone starts from measured evidence and a focused question. The APA 7 title page carries the course line and the module assignment as listed.
2

The Problem

At a composite 240-bed nonprofit community hospital, about 760 patients a year are sent home after a heart failure admission. The hospital's own discharge standard calls for each of them to see a primary care clinician or cardiologist within a week. Over the past fiscal year, only 41% of those patients were seen within that window, and 23.8% of those patients were back in the hospital within 30 days. When care coordinators called 180 patients who had missed their follow-up appointment, the most common reason given, by about a third, was that they had no way to get there.

This capstone addresses that gap. Its problem statement is this: most patients discharged home after heart failure hospitalization at the hospital are not seen by a clinician in the first seven days after they leave, and lack of transportation is the most frequently reported barrier. The capstone will examine the problem, the evidence on solutions and a feasible plan the hospital's administration could adopt.

What this page is doingThe problem is stated with local data and in a single sentence that names the gap and the leading suspected cause, which gives the capstone a clear focus.
3

Significance for Patients

The first week after discharge is when heart failure patients are most fragile. Medications are often changed during the hospital stay, weight and fluid status can shift quickly, and small problems that a clinician could correct in the office become emergencies if they go unnoticed. Hernandez et al. (2010) followed more than 30,000 older Medicare patients sent home from 225 hospitals and found that the typical hospital saw fewer than two in five of them within a week, and that patients from the hospitals doing the least early follow-up came back within a month more often than patients from any other group of hospitals. The study was observational, so it does not prove that follow-up visits prevent readmissions, but it links hospital systems that deliver early follow-up with better outcomes, and the hospital's own figures sit squarely in the weakest group.

Transportation barriers are not a minor inconvenience either. Pulling together 61 U.S. studies, Syed et al. (2013) judged lack of transportation a meaningful block to ongoing care, heaviest for people with low incomes or thin insurance, and traced it to missed and rescheduled visits, delayed care and skipped medicines.

What this page is doingSignificance for patients is established with a large national study, reported with its limits, and a systematic review on transportation barriers.
4

Significance for the Organization

The problem also has direct financial consequences. Under the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program, Medicare reduces payments to hospitals with excess readmissions for several conditions, including heart failure, with the reduction capped at 3% of payments (Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, 2026). The hospital's reduction last year, across all included conditions, was 0.58% of its base Medicare inpatient payments, about $390,000. Each avoidable readmission also consumes a bed during the hospital's busiest months and adds to emergency department boarding. For an administrator, missed follow-up visits are a quality problem, a financial problem and a capacity problem at once, which is why the capstone is framed as an operational issue that administration can act on, not only a clinical one.

What this page is doingThe organizational significance is quantified with a federal payment program cited from its source and connected to capacity, framing the issue for an administrator.
5

Significance for the Community

The hospital serves a county where many older residents no longer drive, bus service ends at 6 p.m. and does not reach several rural townships, and adult children often work during the day. Among the heart failure patients discharged home, about 14% are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid, a group with a Medicaid transportation benefit that many do not know how to use, and many others have Medicare Advantage plans, some of which include rides to medical appointments. The community therefore has partial transportation resources that are not connected to the moment of discharge. A solution designed at the hospital could make better use of benefits that already exist.

What this page is doingCommunity significance is described through local transport conditions and existing benefits, identifying resources a solution could connect.
6

What the Hospital Already Does

The hospital is not starting from nothing, which matters for a realistic capstone. For about 58% of heart failure patients sent home, the unit secretary books a follow-up appointment before discharge and prints it on the discharge papers; the others are told to call their doctor's office, which many never do. A care coordinator attempts a phone call within 48 hours of discharge, but reaches only about 60% of patients because many phone numbers in the record are outdated. Discharge nurses hand out a county transit brochure, but no one asks whether the patient actually has a ride or helps book one. In other words, each piece of a transition process exists, but none is reliable, and none connects the appointment to the means of reaching it. The capstone will therefore look first at strengthening and linking what exists before proposing anything new, since changes that build on current roles are cheaper and easier for staff to adopt.

What this page is doingThe paper describes existing processes and their weak points, which grounds the capstone in current operations and favors building on what exists.
7

Confirming the Problem With Data

The figures above come from a quality report and a set of phone calls, and before the capstone recommends changes, the problem needs a firmer baseline. With the quality department's help, the capstone will draw twelve months of electronic health record data for heart failure patients sent home: whether an appointment was booked before discharge, whether it was kept within seven days, whether the patient was readmitted within 30 days, and the patient's payer, distance from the clinic and whether a caregiver was listed. Those data will show whether missed follow-up is concentrated among particular groups, such as dual-eligible patients or those living farther away, and whether patients with a booked appointment really do better. The phone survey will be repeated with a structured question list, so that transportation can be compared fairly with other reasons, such as not knowing about the appointment or feeling too unwell to go.

What this page is doingA data plan establishes how the baseline will be confirmed and how transportation will be tested against other causes, strengthening the proposal's credibility.
8

Scope, Stakeholders and Questions

The capstone is limited to adults discharged home after a heart failure hospitalization, excluding patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities, hospice or other hospitals, whose follow-up is managed differently. It covers the twelve months after implementation. Stakeholders include patients and caregivers, hospitalists and discharge nurses, care coordinators, the hospital's outpatient cardiology and primary care practices, the finance and quality departments, Medicaid transportation brokers, Medicare Advantage plans and the county transit authority.

Three questions will guide the work. What does the evidence show about interventions that improve early follow-up and reduce transportation barriers? What causes, beyond transportation, explain missed follow-up at this hospital? And what combination of options is feasible, affordable and measurable for the hospital to implement? A capstone that fixes rides but ignores why patients did not know about their appointment would solve a third of the problem.

What this page is doingScope boundaries, stakeholders and guiding questions are set out clearly, including a question that tests the transportation assumption.
9

Why This Problem Suits a Healthcare Administration Capstone

The problem draws on the whole healthcare administration curriculum. It involves quality measurement, finance through the readmissions program, operations through scheduling and discharge processes, human resources through care coordinator roles, law and policy through Medicaid and Medicare transportation benefits, and community health through the barriers patients face after they leave. It is also realistic in scale: the hospital can change its own processes and partnerships without new construction or major capital. The following modules will review the literature, analyze causes and options, build an implementation and evaluation plan, and present a final recommendation to administration.

What this page is doingThe paper justifies the problem's fit with the program by linking it to several areas of the curriculum and confirming it is realistic in scale.
10

References

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services. (2026, September 21). Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program (HRRP). https://www.cms.gov/medicare/payment/prospective-payment-systems/acute-inpatient-pps/hospital-readmissions-reduction-program-hrrp

Hernandez, A. F., Greiner, M. A., Fonarow, G. C., Hammill, B. G., Heidenreich, P. A., Yancy, C. W., Peterson, E. D., & Curtis, L. H. (2010). Relationship between early physician follow-up and 30-day readmission among Medicare beneficiaries hospitalized for heart failure. JAMA, 303(17), 1716-1722. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2010.533

Syed, S. T., Gerber, B. S., & Sharp, L. K. (2013). Traveling towards disease: Transportation barriers to health care access. Journal of Community Health, 38(5), 976-993. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10900-013-9681-1

What the HLTH 4913 Module 1 instructions ask for

HLTH 4913 Module 1 usually asks you to propose the problem your capstone will address. Prompts commonly ask for a concise problem statement supported by data, an explanation of why the problem matters to patients, the organization and the community, a defined scope, a list of stakeholders and the questions or objectives that will guide the rest of the capstone. Many versions ask you to choose a problem in your own workplace or a realistic composite organization and to explain how it connects to the healthcare administration program. Graders look for a problem narrow enough to plan in one term and specific enough to measure before and after. Check Canvas for whether the proposal needs instructor approval before you continue to Module 2.

Inside the HLTH 4913 Module 1 example

The model proposal states the problem first with local numbers and then condenses it into a single problem statement. Significance is argued three ways: for patients, using a large national study reported with its limits and a systematic review on transportation; for the organization, through the federal readmissions penalty cited from its source and the capacity cost; and for the community, through transit gaps and unused benefits. The scope section sets clear boundaries and lists stakeholders, and three guiding questions include one that tests the transportation assumption. A closing section explains why the problem fits a healthcare administration capstone and previews the remaining modules.

Where the points sit in the HLTH 4913 Module 1 rubric

Capstone proposal rubrics usually reward a clear, evidence-based problem statement, well-argued significance, appropriate scope and focused questions. The problem criterion looks for a measurable gap in a defined setting, not a broad topic. Significance earns the most credit when it covers patients, the organization and the community with data and sources. Graders check that the scope is realistic for one term and that stakeholders are identified. Research questions or objectives should lead logically to the later modules. Connection to the program's competencies is a criterion in many sections. Clear writing and correct APA 7 style take the last few points, and a brief note on how the problem was verified with data can strengthen the proposal further.

HLTH 4913 Module 1 help from the desk

Capstone proposals often start too wide, with a topic like improving healthcare access, and never narrow to a problem the organization can act on. Another common gap is significance argued only from national statistics, with no local data. Students also skip the financial side, which administrators care about most. State your problem in one sentence with a number. Say who is excluded and why. Include a question that could prove your first assumption wrong. For a capstone on staffing, claim denials or patient experience instead, describe the setting and share the rubric, and we can shape a Module 1 proposal around it.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More HLTH 4913 and B.S. in Healthcare Administration sample papers

HLTH 4913 Module 1 questions, answered

What does HLTH4913 Module 1 usually ask for?

HLTH4913 typically opens by asking you to propose your capstone problem: a clear problem statement with evidence, its significance for patients, the organization and the community, the scope, stakeholders and the questions the capstone will answer. Your classroom's instructions decide the problem and setting.

How do you write a capstone problem statement?

In one or two sentences, name the gap between current and desired performance, the population and setting, and, where known, the leading cause, supported by local data.

Does early follow-up after heart failure discharge reduce readmissions?

A large observational study found that hospitals with higher rates of follow-up within seven days had lower 30-day readmission rates, although it could not prove cause and effect.

Where can I find a free HLTH 4913 Module 1 sample paper?

This page carries it. The whole Module 1 capstone proposal on missed seven-day follow-up after heart failure discharge is posted, with significance for patients, the hospital and the community, scope and three questions.

How do you choose a capstone topic in healthcare administration?

Choose a measurable problem in a real setting that the organization can act on, that draws on several parts of the curriculum and that is small enough to plan in a term.