SUST 5023 Module 2 Operational Environmental Performance Assessment Example

Reviewed by Cornelius Ravenhill, MBA · American College of Education · Updated

This SUST 5023 Module 2 example measures the operational greenhouse gas emissions of a composite 410-employee office seating plant in Holland, Michigan, for 2022 and 2025. Prepared in APA 7 for American College of Education SUST 5023, Eco-Business: Strategy, Governance, and Sustainable Operations (SUST5023, part of the M.S. in Organizational Leadership (MSOL)), it follows the strategy analysis. Using the Greenhouse Gas Protocol and EPA's 2025 emission factors, it calculates Scope 1 from natural gas and propane and Scope 2 from RFC Michigan grid electricity, reports a 6.5 percent absolute drop and a 17.2 percent drop per chair, adds landfill waste and names data limits and levers.

CourseSUST 5023 Eco-Business: Strategy, Governance, and Sustainable Operations
ModuleModule 2
Paper typeOperational environmental performance assessment
Length1,210 words, about 4 pages plus title and reference pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAmerican College of Education
ProgramM.S. in Organizational Leadership
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for SUST 5023 Module 2

1

11,548 Tonnes Down From 12,352: Measuring a Michigan Seating Plant's Operational Emissions

Student Name

American College of Education

SUST5023: Eco-Business: Strategy, Governance, and Sustainable Operations

Module 2 Assignment

Instructor Name

September 11, 2028

What this page is doingLeading with the two totals tells the reader at once that the paper reports measured results, with their direction of change.
2

Introduction

The first paper examined how Interface builds sustainability into its strategy, with absolute emissions targets from a base year. This paper applies the same discipline to a smaller manufacturer. Lakeshore Seating, a composite company drawn from my experience with details changed, makes office chairs at one plant and an attached warehouse in Holland, Michigan, with 410 employees. Its leaders want to know how the plant's environmental performance has changed since 2022, the year they plan to use as a baseline. This paper sets the boundaries, calculates Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions for 2022 and 2025 with published factors, adds waste and identifies the operational levers behind the results.

3

The Accounting Standard

The Greenhouse Gas Protocol's corporate standard divides emissions into three scopes. Scope 1 covers direct emissions from sources a company owns or controls, such as boilers and ovens. Scope 2 covers emissions from generating the electricity, steam or heat it buys. Scope 3 covers other indirect emissions across the value chain (World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development, 2004). The standard also asks companies to set organizational and operational boundaries, choose a base year and recalculate it if the company's structure changes significantly. Lakeshore uses operational control as its boundary, so the plant and warehouse it runs are fully included.

4

Emission Factors

All factors come from the EPA's 2025 emission factors hub. Natural gas burned in stationary equipment emits 53.06 kilograms of carbon dioxide, 1 gram of methane and 0.1 gram of nitrous oxide per million British thermal units. Propane emits 5.72 kilograms of carbon dioxide, 0.27 gram of methane and 0.05 gram of nitrous oxide per gallon. Electricity on the RFC Michigan grid subregion, based on eGRID2023 data, emits 962.084 pounds of carbon dioxide, 0.082 pound of methane and 0.011 pound of nitrous oxide per megawatt-hour. Methane and nitrous oxide are converted to carbon dioxide equivalent using 100-year global warming potentials of 28 and 265 (U.S. Environmental Protection Agency [EPA], 2025).

5

Activity Data

Activity data come from utility and supplier invoices. In 2022 the plant used 104,500 million British thermal units of natural gas for its boilers, powder coating cure ovens and space heating, 46,000 gallons of propane for warehouse space heaters and 14,900 megawatt-hours of electricity. In 2025 it used 96,000 million British thermal units of natural gas, 38,000 gallons of propane and 14,200 megawatt-hours of electricity. Production rose from 540,000 chairs in 2022 to 610,000 in 2025. Invoices cover every month in both years, and meter readings were checked against them for a sample of months.

6

Scope 1 Results

Natural gas produced 5,544.8 tonnes of carbon dioxide in 2022, plus 2.9 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent from methane and 2.8 from nitrous oxide, for 5,550.5 tonnes. In 2025 it produced 5,099.0 tonnes in total. Propane added 264.1 tonnes in 2022 and 218.2 in 2025. Scope 1 emissions therefore fell from 5,814.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent to 5,317.1, a drop of 8.6 percent. Methane and nitrous oxide add only about 0.1 percent to combustion emissions, but the standard requires them, and including them shows the calculation is complete.

What this page is doingShowing the small contribution of methane and nitrous oxide demonstrates that the calculation follows the standard fully rather than stopping at carbon dioxide.
7

Scope 2 Results

Electricity produced 6,537.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2022 and 6,230.4 in 2025 under the location-based method. To isolate the plant's own change, both years use the same grid factor; applying older eGRID factors to 2022 would mix the plant's performance with changes in the regional grid. The Scope 2 guidance also calls for a market-based figure reflecting any renewable energy purchases or supplier-specific rates. Lakeshore holds no renewable energy certificates and has asked its utility for a supplier-specific rate, so this paper reports the location-based result and notes the market-based figure as pending.

8

Totals and Intensity

Combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions fell from 12,352.0 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent in 2022 to 11,547.5 in 2025, a 6.5 percent absolute reduction. Because production grew 13 percent over the same period, emissions per chair fell further, from 22.9 kilograms to 18.9 kilograms, a 17.2 percent improvement. The two figures tell different stories. Intensity shows the plant becoming more efficient; the absolute figure shows what the atmosphere receives. Science-based targets, like Interface's, are set in absolute terms, so Lakeshore should treat the 6.5 percent as its headline and the intensity gain as an explanation.

9

Waste

Waste sent to landfill fell from 2,300 short tons of mixed solid waste in 2022 to 1,850 in 2025 after the plant began separating foam offcuts and packaging. Using EPA's factor of 0.58 metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per short ton of landfilled mixed waste, landfill emissions fell from about 1,334 to 1,073 tonnes. The plant recycled 620 short tons of corrugated packaging in 2025, with a factor of 0.11 tonnes per short ton, about 68 tonnes (EPA, 2025). Waste emissions are Scope 3 and are reported separately, but they are large enough, about 9 percent of Scope 1 and 2, to deserve management attention.

10

Where the Emissions Come From

Electricity is the largest source, at 54 percent of combined Scope 1 and 2 in 2025, followed by natural gas at 44 percent and propane at 2 percent. Within natural gas, plant engineers estimate that the powder coating cure ovens use about half, the boilers about a third and space heating the rest. Within electricity, compressed air, injection molding for chair bases and lighting dominate. These shares point to the levers that matter: the cure ovens, compressed air leaks and the source of electricity, rather than smaller items such as office equipment.

11

Data Quality

Busch et al. (2022) found that corporate carbon data reported by data providers often disagree, partly because companies define boundaries and methods inconsistently, which limits comparisons across firms. Lakeshore's figures avoid some of these problems by documenting boundaries, factors and invoices, but they have limits. Refrigerant leaks from air conditioning and chillers are excluded because service records are incomplete; they may add a small amount to Scope 1. Production counts mix chair models of different sizes, which affects intensity. And the market-based Scope 2 figure is not yet available.

12

What Drove the Change

Three changes explain most of the improvement. Replacing the oldest cure oven burner in 2023 cut gas use per chair coated. A compressed air leak survey in 2024 found and fixed leaks that the maintenance team estimated wasted about a tenth of compressor output. And moving the warehouse to high-efficiency radiant heaters reduced propane use. Growth in production offset part of these gains. Future reductions of the size science-based targets require will need larger steps, such as electrifying the cure ovens or contracting for renewable electricity, which later papers on supply chains and governance will consider.

13

Conclusion

Measured under the Greenhouse Gas Protocol with EPA's 2025 factors, Lakeshore Seating's combined Scope 1 and 2 emissions fell 6.5 percent from 2022 to 2025, to 11,547.5 tonnes of carbon dioxide equivalent, while emissions per chair fell 17.2 percent. Landfill waste emissions fell as well. Electricity and the cure ovens are the largest sources and the main levers. Clear boundaries, published factors and documented activity data make the figures checkable, and the stated exclusions show where data must improve. The next paper turns from the plant to its supply chain.

14

References

Busch, T., Johnson, M., & Pioch, T. (2022). Corporate carbon performance data: Quo vadis? Journal of Industrial Ecology, 26(1), 350-363. https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.13008

U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. (2025). GHG emission factors hub. https://www.epa.gov/climateleadership/ghg-emission-factors-hub

World Resources Institute & World Business Council for Sustainable Development. (2004). The greenhouse gas protocol: A corporate accounting and reporting standard (Rev. ed.). https://ghgprotocol.org/corporate-standard

What the SUST 5023 Module 2 instructions ask for

The second SUST 5023 paper typically asks you to measure the environmental performance of an organization's operations. Expect to choose a standard, usually the Greenhouse Gas Protocol for emissions, set boundaries and gather activity data such as fuel and electricity use. Most prompts reward showing the emission factors, their source and the calculation, comparing at least two years and reporting both absolute and intensity results. Waste and water can be added where data exist. State what is excluded and why, explain what drove the change and cite the standard and the factor source in APA 7. Keep units consistent and show each step so a reader could repeat the calculation. If you work with real organizational data, ask permission and remove identifying details.

How the SUST 5023 Module 2 example is put together

The sample explains the three scopes and boundary choices, then lists EPA's 2025 factors for natural gas, propane and RFC Michigan electricity, with global warming potentials of 28 and 265. Activity data for both years come from invoices. Scope 1 falls from 5,814.5 to 5,317.1 tonnes and Scope 2 from 6,537.5 to 6,230.4, using one grid factor for both years so that grid changes do not blur the plant's own record. Totals and per-chair intensity follow, then landfill waste, source shares, data quality limits and the three changes that drove improvement. A short note explains why refrigerants were left out and how the market-based figure will be added once the utility responds.

Where the points sit in the SUST 5023 Module 2 rubric

Operational performance papers are graded on method, transparency and interpretation. Graders look for a named standard, clear boundaries, cited emission factors and calculations a reader could repeat. Strong papers compare years consistently, separate absolute from intensity change, include methane and nitrous oxide and state exclusions honestly. Explaining what drove the results and which sources matter most is often credited. Papers that report totals without factors, mix units or years, call intensity gains reductions or ignore data quality tend to score lower. Cite the standard and factor source accurately in APA 7, and label composite or estimated data clearly. A paragraph tying results to specific equipment or practices shows the numbers are being used, not only reported.

SUST 5023 Module 2 help: mistakes that cost points

Emissions calculations go wrong in small ways: the wrong factor year, mixed units or missing gases. We can help you set boundaries, find the right EPA or international factors, build the calculation and interpret absolute and intensity results. Send whatever activity data you have, or request a realistic composite case, and attach your prompt; the draft will show every factor and every step. Plants, offices, hospitals, campuses and warehouses all work. Most assessments are ready within two days, and the calculation tables come with the paper so you can check every number. International factor sources, such as national inventories, can be used for plants outside the United States.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More SUST 5023 and M.S. in Organizational Leadership sample papers

SUST 5023 Module 2 questions, answered

What does SUST5023 Module 2 usually ask for?

Module 2 of SUST5023 usually asks you to measure the environmental performance of an organization's operations, often its greenhouse gas emissions, with a named standard.

What is the difference between Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions?

Scope 1 covers direct emissions from fuel a company burns; Scope 2 covers emissions from generating the electricity, steam or heat it buys.

Where do I find emission factors for a U.S. calculation?

The EPA's GHG emission factors hub lists factors for fuels, grid electricity by eGRID subregion and waste, with global warming potentials.

Where can I find a free SUST 5023 Module 2 sample paper?

This page has one: a Michigan seating plant's Scope 1 and 2 emissions calculated with EPA's 2025 factors, down 6.5 percent absolute and 17.2 percent per chair since 2022.

Should I report absolute or intensity figures?

Both, clearly labeled; intensity shows efficiency, while absolute emissions show the real effect and are what science-based targets measure.