| Course | NUR 5103 Leadership and Management Theory in Nursing |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 6 |
| Paper type | Philosophy of nursing administration |
| Length | 1,170 words, about 4 pages plus title and reference pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | American College of Education |
| Program | MSN Nurse Administrator |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 5103 Module 6
The Unit Is My Patient: A Philosophy of Nursing Administration Built From Five Months at a Long-Term Acute Care Hospital
Student Name
American College of Education
NUR5103: Leadership and Management Theory in Nursing
Module 6 Assignment
Instructor Name
April 6, 2027
A Different Kind of Patient
As a bedside nurse I learned to assess a patient, find what was wrong, act and check whether the action worked. When I became director of nursing at a 40-bed long-term acute care hospital five months ago, I kept the habit and changed the patient. The patient of a nursing administrator is the unit: its structure, its people, its routines and the conditions under which nurses care for the sick. That idea is the center of this philosophy. The American Nurses Association (2016) describes nursing administration as a specialty whose practice is directed toward the environment in which nursing care is delivered, and whose standards, like those of clinical nursing, move through assessment, planning, implementation and evaluation. I hold five beliefs about how to practice that specialty well, each learned or tested in the months this course has covered.
Most Problems Are Structural Before They Are Personal
When the weaning protocol stalled, it looked like a problem of reluctant nurses and cautious therapists. When night nurses and therapists clashed after a patient pulled out his tube, it looked like a problem of two hostile groups. In both cases the cause was written into the structure: a protocol that moved authority without saying so, and a gap between two tasks that nobody owned. Heifetz et al. (2009) warn that the most common failure of leadership is to treat an adaptive challenge as a technical one; I would add that the second most common failure is to treat a structural problem as a personal one. My first question about any failure is now what in our design made this the easy thing to do.
The Manager's Capacity Is a Patient Safety Issue
I used to think of spans of control as an organizational chart detail. Our nurse manager had 96 direct reports, and every management function except the urgent ones had stopped. McCutcheon et al. (2009) found that as spans of control widen, even transformational leadership cannot overcome their negative effect on nurse and patient satisfaction. I now treat the capacity of front-line managers the way I would treat nurse staffing: as a condition of safe care that must be measured and defended in the budget. The first strategic priority I proposed for our service line was not a new program but two assistant manager positions, because every other priority depended on them.
Decisions That Change Someone's Work Are Made With Them
The 0430 sedation time was chosen by one department for another department's patients, and the result was an injured patient and a week of silent resistance. When I faced the decision about reopening six beds, I used the Vroom and Jago (2007) model to decide who should take part, and I consulted the charge nurses before choosing. The option we adopted was theirs, not mine. I do not believe every decision should be made by consensus; some must be made quickly and some involve information I cannot share. I do believe that when a decision changes the daily work of nurses, the people who will do that work must be heard before it is made, and that I owe them an explanation afterward either way.
Consultation is not a courtesy I extend when time allows; it is how I find out what I do not know about my own unit.
Relationships Carry the Work
The evidence on leadership style and nursing outcomes is unusually consistent. Cummings et al. (2018) sorted the outcomes reported in 129 studies into six groups, from job satisfaction to productivity, and in each group leaders who attend to people and relationships were linked with better results for nurses than leaders who attend mainly to tasks. Wong et al. (2010) showed that authentic leadership builds the trust from which nurses speak up about care. I have learned that trust is built less by what I say at meetings than by whether I behave the same way on a bad day as on a good one, whether I admit what I missed and whether I bring the night shift the same news, in person, that the day shift hears. When I told staff that I had misread the protocol problem at first, the huddle became more honest the next week.
Data Belong to the People Who Produce Them
For years our breathing trial rates, falls and ventilator-associated events went to the quality department and nowhere else. The nurses who produced those numbers never saw them. Posting the daily breathing trial rate at the huddle did more to raise it than any memo, and a sudden drop in the rate was the first sign of the conflict between nurses and therapists. Hospitals that have strengthened their nurse work environments, including through the shared governance and data transparency that Magnet recognition requires, have seen patient and nurse outcomes improve faster than hospitals that did not (Kutney-Lee et al., 2015). I will share the unit's data with its staff, including results that reflect poorly on my own decisions, and I will ask staff what the numbers mean before I decide.
Where the Beliefs Pull Against Each Other
These beliefs do not always agree. Consulting staff takes time, and the host hospital's intensive care unit did not want to wait for our meeting. Sharing data with staff can frighten a unit that is already tired, especially when the numbers are bad. Defending managers' capacity costs money that could have gone to bedside positions, and some nurses told me plainly that they would rather have one more nurse on nights than an assistant manager they seldom see. I do not resolve these tensions by rule. I resolve them case by case, and I try to say out loud which belief I am favoring and why, so that staff can judge whether I am being consistent. When I cannot explain a choice in terms of these five beliefs, I take that as a sign that I am deciding for convenience rather than conviction, and I slow down.
Commitments
A philosophy is useful only if it changes what I do on Monday. From these beliefs follow five commitments for the coming year. I will ask what in our design made a failure likely before asking who failed. I will report the span of control and turnover of every front-line manager to the executive team each quarter, next to the patient safety measures. I will consult the people whose work a decision changes and explain every decision to them afterward. I will round on the night shift at least twice a month. And I will post every unit's core measures where its staff can see them, with the good and the bad together. I expect to revise this philosophy as I learn; the version I wrote before this course would have said much more about vision and much less about the moment between two tasks at 0430.
References
American Nurses Association. (2016). Nursing administration: Scope and standards of practice (2nd ed.). Nursesbooks.org.
Cummings, G. G., Tate, K., Lee, S., Wong, C. A., Paananen, T., Micaroni, S. P. M., & Chatterjee, G. E. (2018). Leadership styles and outcome patterns for the nursing workforce and work environment: A systematic review. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 85, 19-60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2018.04.016
Heifetz, R. A., Grashow, A., & Linsky, M. (2009). The practice of adaptive leadership: Tools and tactics for changing your organization and the world. Harvard Business Press.
Kutney-Lee, A., Stimpfel, A. W., Sloane, D. M., Cimiotti, J. P., Quinn, L. W., & Aiken, L. H. (2015). Changes in patient and nurse outcomes associated with Magnet hospital recognition. Medical Care, 53(6), 550-557. https://doi.org/10.1097/MLR.0000000000000355
McCutcheon, A. S., Doran, D., Evans, M., McGillis Hall, L., & Pringle, D. (2009). Effects of leadership and span of control on nurses' job satisfaction and patient satisfaction. Nursing Leadership, 22(3), 48-67. https://doi.org/10.12927/cjnl.2009.21154
Vroom, V. H., & Jago, A. G. (2007). The role of the situation in leadership. American Psychologist, 62(1), 17-24. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.62.1.17
Wong, C. A., Spence Laschinger, H. K., & Cummings, G. G. (2010). Authentic leadership and nurses' voice behaviour and perceptions of care quality. Journal of Nursing Management, 18(8), 889-900. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2834.2010.01113.x
What the NUR 5103 Module 6 instructions ask for
The final module of NUR 5103 frequently asks for a personal philosophy of nursing administration grounded in the theories and evidence from the course. Most prompts expect a central idea, a limited number of beliefs, each supported by theory or research and illustrated with a real decision, and commitments for your practice as an administrator. Many invite first-person writing and ask you to link the philosophy to the professional scope and standards for nursing administration. The philosophy usually runs about five pages. The Canvas page notes how many beliefs or theories are expected and whether earlier module papers should be cited as examples.
How the NUR 5103 Module 6 example is put together
The philosophy opens with its central idea, treating the unit as the administrator's patient, and connects it to the professional scope of nursing administration, promising five beliefs. Each belief has its own section: the structural belief draws on two decisions from earlier modules and adaptive leadership, extended in the author's words; the capacity belief cites a study on manager span and shows a budget choice; the participation belief is qualified and supported with the decision model from Module 4; the relationship belief rests on two strong sources and an admitted error; and the data belief draws on work environment research and commits to sharing unfavorable results. A section on where the beliefs pull against each other follows, and measurable commitments close the paper.
Reading the NUR 5103 Module 6 rubric
Philosophy papers are judged on whether the beliefs are earned. Each belief earns credit when it rests on a theory or study and on a real decision the writer made, not on a value every leader would endorse. The rubric also rewards a central idea that organizes the beliefs and a link to the professional scope and standards. Graders often give the top band to papers that admit where beliefs conflict and explain how the writer handles that tension. Commitments are scored on specificity and measurability, and on whether they follow from the beliefs. First-person voice is expected, kept professional. APA 7, including the ANA scope document as a corporate author, finishes the rubric.
NUR 5103 Module 6 help: mistakes that cost points
Administration philosophies most often list values such as integrity, compassion and excellence with no evidence and no decisions. Another frequent weakness is too many beliefs, each treated in a sentence. Students also present beliefs as absolute, which experienced graders distrust. Choose four or five. Tie each to a decision you actually made and what happened. Qualify where needed, for example deciding with staff except in emergencies. Name a conflict between two beliefs. End with commitments someone could check in a year. If you lead in acute care, a clinic network or education, a philosophy grounded in that role can be written to your rubric.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 5103 and MSN Nurse Administrator sample papers
- NUR 5103 Module 1: Leadership Theory Comparison
- NUR 5103 Module 2: Management Functions Analysis
- NUR 5103 Module 3: Strategic Service Line Analysis
- NUR 5103 Module 4: Decision-Making Model Application
- NUR 5103 Module 5: Conflict Analysis and Negotiation
- NUR 5113 Module 2: Unit Operating Budget
- NUR 5094 Module 5: Leadership Project Evaluation
- NUR 5113 Module 3: Budget Variance Analysis
- NUR 5113 Module 4: Capital Request and Business Case
NUR 5103 Module 6 questions, answered
Can a philosophy paper cite research?
Yes, and a strong one does. Each belief should rest on a theory or study and on an example from practice, so the reader sees why you hold it and how it guides decisions.
How do I keep a philosophy from sounding generic?
Tie each belief to a real decision you faced, say what you did and what happened, and end with specific commitments. Avoid beliefs that every nurse leader would sign without thinking.
Where can I find a free NUR 5103 Module 6 sample paper?
The Unit Is My Patient philosophy is open above for free, with its central idea, five beliefs and their evidence, the tensions between them and the measurable commitments.
How many beliefs should a philosophy of nursing administration include?
Four or five is usually enough. Fewer than three looks thin, and more than six leaves too little room to support each one with a source and a real decision.
Can my philosophy of nursing administration be written in the first person?
Yes. Most instructors expect it, since the paper states what you believe and how you lead. Keep the evidence cited in APA 7 and keep the tone professional rather than conversational.