| Course | NUR 4093 Senior Capstone Experience for Nursing |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 1 |
| Paper type | Capstone problem statement |
| Length | 1,160 words, about 4 pages plus title and reference pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | American College of Education |
| Program | RN to BSN |
| Updated | October 2026 |
Free sample paper for NUR 4093 Module 1
From Opioid Side Effects to Day Three Without a Bowel Movement: Narrowing a Capstone Problem on an Orthopedic Unit
Student Name
American College of Education
NUR4093: Senior Capstone Experience for Nursing
Module 1 Assignment
Instructor Name
March 1, 2027
The Broad Concern
The capstone began with a concern that almost every orthopedic nurse shares: patients recovering from joint replacement suffer from the side effects of the opioids they need for pain. On the 26-bed orthopedic unit where the author works, a composite described for this assignment, patients after hip and knee replacement routinely receive oxycodone for the first several days, and nurses spend part of every shift managing nausea, drowsiness, itching and constipation. The concern is real, and it is far too broad for a capstone. It spans several side effects with different causes and treatments, it involves prescribing decisions that belong to surgeons and anesthesiologists, and it offers no single measure that would show whether anything improved.
A capstone problem has to be narrow enough for one nurse, working within a nursing scope, to change something measurable in the time the course allows. The work of this module is subtraction: removing everything a single nurse cannot move until what is left is small enough to change and important enough to matter.
First Narrowing: One Side Effect
The first step was to choose one side effect. Nausea and drowsiness are often managed by adjusting or changing the opioid, which is a prescriber's decision. Constipation is different. Opioids slow gut motility by acting on opioid receptors in the gastrointestinal tract, and tolerance to this effect develops poorly, so constipation tends to persist as long as the drug is taken (Kumar et al., 2014). Prevention depends largely on nursing actions: giving scheduled laxatives, encouraging mobility and fluids, and recognizing early when a patient has not had a bowel movement. Constipation after surgery also causes real harm, including abdominal pain, nausea, reduced appetite and, in some patients, delayed discharge.
Choosing constipation narrowed the problem to something within nursing's reach. It was still too broad, because it did not say which patients, how constipation would be defined or what counted as a problem.
Second Narrowing: A Population and a Definition
The second step was to choose a population and a definition. The unit admits patients after hip and knee replacement, spine surgery and fracture repair. Fracture patients are often older and frailer, with more variable opioid use, and spine patients have different mobility restrictions. Elective hip and knee replacement patients form the most uniform group: similar ages, similar opioid regimens, early mobilization protocols and a predictable length of stay of two to four days. Limiting the problem to them makes a baseline meaningful and a change detectable.
Constipation needed a definition that a nurse could apply from the chart without a new assessment tool. The unit already documents bowel movements on the flowsheet, so the definition chosen was the absence of a documented bowel movement by 2359 on the third postoperative day. That threshold is practical rather than diagnostic; it does not capture stool form or discomfort, which a later module can add using a stool form scale (Lewis & Heaton, 1997), but it can be counted retrospectively and reliably from existing records.
The Baseline
With a population and definition in hand, the author reviewed the records of the 80 most recent consecutive patients admitted after elective hip or knee replacement, with approval from the unit manager and the hospital's quality department. Of the 80, 37, or 46 percent, had no documented bowel movement by the end of the third postoperative day. The bowel regimen ordered on admission was docusate alone for 56 patients, or 70 percent, although a randomized trial found that adding docusate to a stimulant laxative gave no benefit over adding a placebo (Tarumi et al., 2013). Senna was ordered as needed for 48 patients, but only 15 of those 48 received at least one dose before the third day.
Two points stand out. The regimen most often ordered is the one with the least evidence behind it, and the more effective option was available but rarely given. The problem is not a missing treatment; it is a treatment that exists on paper and does not reach the patient. That finding places the problem squarely within nursing practice, where a capstone can act on it.
What the Problem Is Not
Narrowing also means stating what the capstone will not attempt. It will not try to reduce opioid use after joint replacement, although multimodal analgesia that lowers opioid doses would likely reduce constipation too; that work belongs to the acute pain service and the surgeons, and it is already the subject of a separate hospital initiative. It will not address constipation in fracture or spine patients, whose needs differ enough to require their own baseline. It will not introduce new medications such as peripherally acting opioid antagonists, which are reserved for constipation that does not respond to laxatives and require prescriber decisions. And it will not rely on patient-reported symptoms at this stage, because the unit has no validated symptom tool in routine use and adding one would make the baseline impossible to compare.
Stating these exclusions protects the project from drift. When colleagues suggest adding fracture patients or a new drug, the problem statement gives a reason to say not yet, and the later modules can return to those ideas once the narrowed problem has been addressed. A capstone that tries to fix everything a colleague mentions usually finishes having changed nothing it can measure.
Testing the Narrowed Problem
The narrowed problem was tested against four criteria. It is significant, because nearly half of a large, predictable patient group experiences it and it causes discomfort and possible delays. It is within nursing scope, because the gap lies in how as-needed laxatives are given and how bowel status is monitored, though changing the default order set will need a prescriber partner. It is measurable from existing data, with a baseline already calculated. And it is feasible within the capstone timeline, because the unit admits about 25 joint replacement patients a month, enough to see a change within two to three months.
Stated in one sentence, the capstone problem is: on a 26-bed orthopedic unit, 46 percent of adults after elective hip or knee replacement have no documented bowel movement by the end of the third postoperative day, while an effective as-needed laxative that is already ordered for most of them is rarely given. Every later module in this capstone will be checked against that sentence.
Conclusion
The capstone began with a concern about opioid side effects and ended, three narrowing steps later, with a problem one nurse can move: nearly half of joint replacement patients on one unit reach day three without a bowel movement, and the laxative that could help sits unused in their orders. Each step removed something that was real but out of reach, and each left the problem more measurable. The result is a problem statement with a population, a setting, a definition, a baseline and a gap that nursing practice can close.
References
Kumar, L., Barker, C., & Emmanuel, A. (2014). Opioid-induced constipation: Pathophysiology, clinical consequences, and management. Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2014, Article 141737. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/141737
Lewis, S. J., & Heaton, K. W. (1997). Stool form scale as a useful guide to intestinal transit time. Scandinavian Journal of Gastroenterology, 32(9), 920-924. https://doi.org/10.3109/00365529709011203
Tarumi, Y., Wilson, M. P., Szafran, O., & Spooner, G. R. (2013). Randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of oral docusate in the management of constipation in hospice patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 45(1), 2-13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.008
What the NUR 4093 Module 1 instructions ask for
NUR 4093 begins the capstone with the problem, and Module 1 usually asks you to identify a practice problem and state it precisely enough to build a project on. Most prompts expect the problem's significance, the population and setting, evidence that it exists locally, and a sense of how it could be measured. Some ask for a PICOT question at this stage; others leave that for later. Many instructors stress feasibility: the problem must be within nursing scope and movable in the course timeline. Expect about four pages. Look at the Canvas instructions for whether baseline data are required now and whether your project must be set on your own unit.
How the NUR 4093 Module 1 example is put together
The example begins with a concern any orthopedic nurse would recognize and then judges it against what a capstone needs. The narrowing is shown as a sequence: first one side effect, constipation, chosen from several for reasons stated; then one population and one definition, chosen for feasibility with the limitation admitted. The baseline section reports a small approved review with counts and percentages and links the current regimen to a randomized trial by Tarumi and colleagues. A section on what the problem is not lists exclusions such as pain control and mobility protocols, each with a reason. The paper then tests the narrowed problem against measurability, scope and timeline before a short conclusion restates it as one sentence for every later module.
Reading the NUR 4093 Module 1 rubric
Capstone problem statements are typically graded on clarity and specificity, significance, evidence of the local problem and feasibility. Clarity marks require a problem with a defined population, setting and measure; a topic is not enough. Significance points go to evidence from the literature that the problem matters, such as Kumar and colleagues on opioid-induced constipation. The local evidence criterion rewards baseline data with numerators and denominators and an explanation of how they were obtained. Feasibility points depend on showing the problem is within nursing scope and movable in time, which the testing section does explicitly. Writing and APA 7 complete the rubric, and a problem statement that ends in one sentence later modules can quote tends to score best.
Common NUR 4093 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Capstone problem statements most often stay at the level of a topic, such as pain management or falls, which cannot be measured or changed in a term. Another frequent issue is a problem outside nursing scope, such as changing a surgeon's prescribing. Students also skip baseline data or give a percentage without its denominator. Narrow in visible steps so the grader sees the reasoning. Name exclusions; they protect the project later. Get permission before reviewing any records, even informally. If your capstone grows out of an outpatient clinic, a nursing home or a school, a problem statement built in that setting can be prepared on request.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More NUR 4093 and RN to BSN sample papers
- NUR 4093 Module 2: Capstone Evidence Appraisal
- NUR 4093 Module 3: Capstone Implementation Plan
- NUR 4093 Module 4: Capstone Evaluation Plan
- NUR 4093 Module 5: Capstone Consistency Review
- NUR 4093 Module 6: Capstone Presentation
- NUR 4013 Module 3: Nursing Theory Application Paper
- NUR 4063 Module 5: Change Proposal
- NUR 4043 Module 2: Social Determinants Analysis
- NUR 4073 Module 5: Teaching Plan
NUR 4093 Module 1 questions, answered
How narrow should a capstone problem be?
Narrow enough that you can measure it with data you can actually get, change it within nursing scope and see a difference within the course timeline. A single side effect in one patient group on one unit is usually right; a broad topic such as pain management or patient safety is too wide to show any change.
Do I need baseline data in a capstone problem statement?
Baseline data make the problem concrete and give later modules something to compare against. A small, approved review of recent records or existing unit reports is usually enough. Report numerators and denominators, explain how you defined the problem and note what the baseline does not capture.
Where can I find a free NUR 4093 Module 1 sample paper?
The orthopedic bowel problem statement is available on this page at no charge, with the three narrowing steps, the baseline, the exclusions, the feasibility test, three references and section notes.
Can my NUR 4093 capstone continue the PICOT question from NUR 4053?
Often yes, and it saves time if the question is still relevant and feasible. Check that it can be measured on your unit within the term, and narrow it further if the original was broad.
Do I need approval to collect baseline data for the capstone?
Usually you need at least your manager's permission and sometimes a quality or IRB determination, even for a small chart review. Ask before you look at any records, and report only aggregate numbers without identifiers.