NUR 4033 Module 1 Health History Write-Up Example

Reviewed by Junia Fairbank, MSN, RN · American College of Education · Updated

This NUR 4033 Module 1 example is a comprehensive health history write-up for a composite 29-year-old line cook who keeps returning with upper abdominal pain. It was written for American College of Education NUR 4033, Health Assessment, an RN to BSN course listed in Canvas as NUR4033. The paper moves through identifying data, chief complaint, history of present illness, past and family history, social history and a review of systems, keeping the client's report apart from anything the nurse observed. A separate section then explains how the interview turned a first answer of a few beers and nothing for pain into an accurate alcohol and ibuprofen history, citing motivational interviewing and the AUDIT-C. It closes with working concerns, not a diagnosis. Your prompt usually decides whether a full or focused history is due.

CourseNUR 4033 Health Assessment
ModuleModule 1
Paper typeComprehensive health history write-up
Length1,380 words, about 5 pages plus title and reference pages
FormatAPA 7 student paper
SchoolAmerican College of Education
ProgramRN to BSN
UpdatedOctober 2026

Free sample paper for NUR 4033 Module 1

1

Comprehensive Health History of a 29-Year-Old Line Cook With Recurring Upper Abdominal Pain

Student Name

American College of Education

NUR4033: Health Assessment

Module 1 Assignment

Instructor Name

March 2, 2026

What this page is doingThe title gives age, occupation and chief complaint, which is how a clinical write-up is identified, and it avoids naming a diagnosis the history has not yet established. That restraint is itself a signal of assessment skill. The APA 7 student title page carries the course line and the module assignment as listed in the classroom.
2

Identifying Data and Chief Complaint

The client, 29, cooks on the line full time at a busy downtown restaurant and lives with a roommate in a rented apartment. He came to a walk-in primary care clinic on a weekday afternoon and was the source of his own history, which appeared reliable once the interview was under way. Both the client and the clinic are invented composites for this assignment; no real person or record is described. His chief complaint, in his words, was a burning pain up high in the stomach that keeps coming back.

History of present illness. The pain began about three months ago and has become more frequent over the past three weeks. It is located in the epigastric area just below the sternum, does not radiate and is described as burning. At its worst he rates it 5 on a 10-point scale. It occurs most days, usually two to three hours after a meal and sometimes wakes him around 0200. Eating a small amount of bread or drinking milk relieves it for about an hour; lying flat after a late shift makes it worse. He has tried an over-the-counter antacid about four times a week with partial relief. He denies vomiting, blood in vomit, black or tarry stools, difficulty swallowing and unintended weight loss, and he reports no fever. The timing, the nocturnal waking and the relief with food form a pattern worth recording in the client's own sequence before any interpretation is attached to it.

What this page is doingThe history of present illness follows the familiar onset, location, duration, character, aggravating and relieving factors, radiation, timing and severity sequence without labeling each element, which reads more naturally than a checklist. The pertinent negatives, no bleeding, no weight loss, no dysphagia, are the alarm features a grader looks for, and they are documented as denials rather than assumptions.
3

Past History, Medications and Family History

Past health history. He had a fractured left wrist at age 16, treated with a cast. He has had no surgeries and no hospital admissions. He reports low back pain for about a year from long hours standing and lifting stock pots, for which he has not seen a clinician. Immunizations are reported as complete in childhood; he does not recall a tetanus booster since high school and has not had an influenza vaccine this season. He reports no known drug allergies.

Medications. At first he reported taking no medications. When asked specifically about anything he takes for pain, even from a store, he said that he takes ibuprofen most days for his back, usually two 200 mg tablets at the start of a shift and two more partway through, and sometimes four tablets at once on long weekend shifts. That amounts to 800 to 1,200 mg on a typical workday, on five or six days a week, for most of the past year. He also uses the antacid described above and takes no supplements.

Family history. His father, 58, has hypertension and had a peptic ulcer treated about fifteen years ago. His mother, 55, has type 2 diabetes. A paternal uncle died of liver disease in his fifties, which the client attributed to heavy drinking. He has one younger sister, 25, who is healthy. There is no known family history of stomach or colon cancer.

What this page is doingThe medication paragraph records both the first answer and the corrected one, with the exact wording of the question that produced the correction. That detail is what makes the history trustworthy to the next clinician and shows the interviewer's skill. The daily dose is calculated in the note rather than left for the reader to work out.
4

Personal and Social History and Review of Systems

Personal and social history. He works ten-hour shifts five to six days a week, usually from 1400 to midnight, and eats his main meal after midnight. Coffee runs to three or four cups daily. He has smoked roughly ten cigarettes daily for eleven years. His alcohol history is described in detail in the next section; in summary, he drinks four to five beers after most shifts and more on his days off. He denies other substance use. He is not in a relationship, reports good support from his sister and a coworker, and says his stress is mostly about money and work hours. He has employer health coverage that he has used twice.

Review of systems. General: reports fatigue on days off; denies fever, night sweats and weight change. Skin: no rashes or jaundice. Head, eyes, ears, nose and throat: no concerns. Respiratory: morning cough without blood, which he links to smoking; no shortness of breath. Cardiovascular: no chest pain with exertion, palpitations or swelling. Gastrointestinal: as in the history of present illness; bowel movements daily and formed; denies diarrhea and constipation. Genitourinary: no concerns. Musculoskeletal: low back ache at the end of shifts without leg numbness or weakness. Neurologic: occasional headaches on days after heavy drinking. Psychiatric: reports feeling irritable when he has not slept; denies low mood most days and denies thoughts of self-harm. Each system is documented as a statement the client made or denied, not as a finding, because a review of systems is history and not examination.

What this page is doingThe social history is specific about timing and quantity, which is where most student histories go vague. The review of systems keeps positive and negative responses in the client's report rather than presenting them as exam findings, a distinction the highlighted sentence makes explicit. The mood questions include a direct question about self-harm, which is expected in a comprehensive history.
5

How the Interview Reached the Honest Answers

Two disclosures changed this history: the daily ibuprofen and the amount of alcohol. Neither appeared in response to the first question. When asked whether he drank alcohol, the client said he had a few beers now and then. That answer is common and is not necessarily an attempt to mislead; many people use general terms for amounts they have never counted. The interviewer responded without comment and moved to specific, normalizing questions: many people who work late restaurant shifts wind down with a drink after closing, and how many drinks would he have on a typical night after work? He answered four or five. He was then asked the three questions of the AUDIT-C, which asks how often a person drinks, how many drinks on a typical drinking day and how often six or more drinks are consumed on one occasion (Bush et al., 1998). His answers gave a score of 9 out of 12, well above the threshold usually used to identify unhealthy drinking in men.

The medication disclosure followed the same logic. Asking whether a client takes any medications often yields only prescriptions, because people do not think of over-the-counter pills as medicine. A more specific question about anything taken for pain, including from a store, prompted the ibuprofen history immediately. Jarvis and Eckhardt (2024) recommend open-ended questions followed by focused ones for exactly this reason: the open question invites the client's story, and the focused question fills the gaps the client does not know are important.

The tone of the interview mattered as much as the wording. Miller and Rollnick (2013) describe how a nonjudgmental, curious stance makes people more willing to talk about behaviors they expect to be criticized for. The interviewer did not react to the amount of alcohol, did not lecture about ibuprofen and summarized what she had heard before moving on, which gave the client a chance to correct anything that was wrong. An accurate history is not extracted from a client; it is offered by one who has decided the interviewer can be trusted with it. The United States Preventive Services Task Force recommends screening adults in primary care for unhealthy alcohol use and offering brief counseling to those who screen positive (U.S. Preventive Services Task Force [USPSTF], 2018), and the AUDIT-C result from this interview makes that counseling possible at the next step of the visit.

What this page is doingThis section is what separates a strong Module 1 paper from a template history: it explains how the interviewer obtained the information, with the exact questions that worked and the sources behind the technique. The AUDIT-C is described by what it asks, the score is reported with its scale, and the screening recommendation is tied to what happens next in the visit.
6

Interpretation and Next Steps

The history points toward peptic ulcer disease or erosive gastritis as the leading working concern. Burning epigastric pain that occurs hours after meals, wakes the client at night and is relieved by food and antacids fits that pattern, and the history contains several risk factors together: daily nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug use at a substantial dose for most of a year, heavy alcohol use, smoking, late-night meals and a father with a treated ulcer. Gastroesophageal reflux disease remains possible given the worsening when lying flat after late meals. No alarm features were reported, but the reliance on self-report means they must be confirmed on examination and, where appropriate, with testing.

The history also shapes the physical examination that follows. The examination should include vital signs with attention to heart rate and orthostatic changes, an abdominal examination for epigastric tenderness, guarding and liver size, inspection of the skin and conjunctivae for pallor, and a check for signs of chronic alcohol use. The findings will be reported to the nurse practitioner along with a recommendation to discuss stopping or replacing the ibuprofen, testing for Helicobacter pylori and a brief alcohol intervention during this visit. A health history is complete when it leads somewhere, and this one leads to three concrete decisions.

What this page is doingThe interpretation is framed as working concerns rather than a diagnosis, which is within nursing scope and honest about the limits of history alone. Risk factors are listed from the history itself, and the paper closes by showing how the history directs the examination, which is the reason the course teaches history first.
7

References

Bush, K., Kivlahan, D. R., McDonell, M. B., Fihn, S. D., & Bradley, K. A. (1998). The AUDIT alcohol consumption questions (AUDIT-C): An effective brief screening test for problem drinking. Archives of Internal Medicine, 158(16), 1789-1795. https://doi.org/10.1001/archinte.158.16.1789

Jarvis, C., & Eckhardt, A. (2024). Physical examination and health assessment (9th ed.). Elsevier.

Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2013). Motivational interviewing: Helping people change (3rd ed.). Guilford Press.

U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. (2018). Screening and behavioral counseling interventions to reduce unhealthy alcohol use in adolescents and adults: US Preventive Services Task Force recommendation statement. JAMA, 320(18), 1899-1909. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.2018.16789

What the NUR 4033 Module 1 instructions ask for

NUR 4033 Module 1 usually opens the course with the health history and the communication that makes it accurate. In most sections you interview a volunteer or build a composite client, then write up a complete history in the standard order: identifying data, chief complaint, present illness, past history, medications, allergies, family history, personal and social history, and a review of systems. Many prompts also ask you to reflect on the interviewing techniques you used and to cite a source for them. Some instructors want a focused history tied to one complaint instead of a full one. The written version tends to run four or five pages; the template version pairs a filled form with a short narrative. Confirm in Canvas whether a real volunteer is required and how identifying details must be handled.

How the NUR 4033 Module 1 example is put together

The write-up follows the order a clinician expects, so each component sits where a grader looks for it. The present illness covers onset, location, duration, character, triggers, radiation, timing and severity in prose rather than a checklist, and lists the pertinent negatives. The medication paragraph records both the first answer and the corrected one, along with the exact question that produced the correction. The social history gives quantities and timing for alcohol, tobacco and work hours, and the review of systems keeps every item in the client's own report. A fifth section steps outside the template to explain how the honest answers were reached, citing Miller and Rollnick and the Bush validation of the AUDIT-C. The interpretation names working concerns and the examination the history points toward.

Where the points sit in the NUR 4033 Module 1 rubric

Rubric rows for this module generally cover completeness of the history, accuracy of documentation, communication technique and APA writing. Completeness points go to a history with every standard component present and the present illness fully characterized, pertinent negatives included. Documentation marks reward keeping subjective data subjective; the review of systems should never read like examination findings. The communication criterion is where a strong paper earns its margin, and it asks for specific techniques tied to specific disclosures, which is why the interview section quotes the questions that worked. Graders also check that interpretation stays within nursing scope, framed as concerns rather than a medical diagnosis. The last criterion covers organization, professional tone and APA 7 citation of the textbook and screening sources.

Common NUR 4033 Module 1 mistakes, and how to avoid them

The first common slip is a vague present illness: stomach pain for a while tells the next clinician nothing. A second is mixing what the client said with what the nurse saw, especially in the review of systems. Students also record medications as none without asking about over-the-counter products and supplements, which this example shows can change everything. Alcohol histories go wrong when they accept a social drinker label instead of counting drinks. Keep the interpretation short and cautious. Remove names, employers and dates of birth if you used a volunteer. If your section wants a focused history, a pediatric client or a different template, ask the desk for a history built on that client instead.

Write yours, or have the desk draft it

This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.

More NUR 4033 and RN to BSN sample papers

NUR 4033 Module 1 questions, answered

What does NUR4033 Module 1 usually ask for?

NUR4033 Module 1 often centers on the health history and the communication skills needed to obtain it. Many sections ask for a written comprehensive or focused history on a volunteer or a composite client, sometimes with a reflection on the interview. Your classroom's instructions decide the format, which components are required and whether a recorded interview is involved.

How do I write a history of present illness that scores well?

Cover onset, location, duration, character, aggravating and relieving factors, radiation, timing and severity, and record the client's own words for the main complaint. Add pertinent negatives, the symptoms you asked about that the client denied, because they show clinical reasoning. Keep interpretation out of the history section itself and place it in a separate conclusion.

Should a history paper explain how the interview was conducted?

If the rubric includes communication, yes. Describe the questions that produced important disclosures, such as a specific question about over-the-counter pain relievers, and cite a source for the technique. Showing how you obtained accurate information is often what separates a strong Module 1 paper from a correct but mechanical history.

Where can I find a free NUR 4033 Module 1 sample paper?

It is on this page: the complete history write-up for a line cook with upper abdominal pain, with the present illness, social history, review of systems, the interview reflection, margin notes and four references. Read it free.

Can I use a family member as the volunteer for the NUR 4033 health history?

Many instructors allow it, but some ask for a volunteer outside the family so the interview feels clinical. Check the Canvas instructions, get the volunteer's consent, and remove the name, birth date and any other detail that would identify the person.