| Course | HLTH 6403 Theories and Principles of Behavior Change in Health Education |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 3 |
| Paper type | Sociological analysis |
| Length | 1,250 words, about 5 pages plus title and reference pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | American College of Education |
| Program | Ed.S. in Public Health Education |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 6403 Module 3
Crews, Coaches and Convenience Stores: The Sociological Influences Behind Oral Nicotine Use by Young Workers and Athletes on the Northern Plains
Student Name
American College of Education
HLTH6403: Theories and Principles of Behavior Change in Health Education
Module 3 Assignment
Instructor Name
January 26, 2026
Introduction
The first two modules explained oral nicotine use among young men in a composite Plains county through individual-level constructs: images of the typical user, willingness to accept an offer, attitudes and norms. Those constructs describe what happens in a young man's mind when a teammate or a crew leader holds out a tin. They do not explain why the tin is there, why older men carry it, why the rig bans cigarettes but not snuff or why a gas station forty miles from the nearest city stocks a dozen pouch flavors. This paper turns to those questions. It examines five sociological influences: social networks, cultural expectations of men, the organization of work, sports institutions and the commercial environment. For each, it asks what the influence is, what evidence supports it and what it means for health education.
Social Networks
Health behaviors travel through relationships. In a study of 12,067 people followed from 1971 to 2003 in the Framingham Heart Study, Christakis and Fowler (2008) found clusters of smokers and nonsmokers extending to three degrees of separation and showed that groups of connected people tended to quit together. When a spouse quit, a person's chance of smoking fell by 67%; for a friend the figure was 36%, and among people in small firms, a coworker's quitting reduced the chance by 34%. The study concerned cigarettes rather than oral nicotine, but its logic applies. In the county, focus group participants traced their first use to specific people, most often an older brother, a teammate or a man on their crew, and users described their friends as mostly users. If use spreads through ties, so can quitting, and the network is as much a target for health education as the individual.
Cultural Expectations of Men
Courtenay (2000) argued that many health-related behaviors are ways of demonstrating masculinity, and that practices harmful to men's health often serve as signs of manhood and tools for gaining status among other men. His relational theory also stresses that the form of masculinity men enact depends on economic status, education and social context. In this county, the kind of manhood most valued is tied to physical work, endurance, self-reliance and knowing how to handle discomfort without complaint. Dipping fits that image: it is associated with long days outdoors and with older men who are respected for their work. Pouches have been absorbed into a related but newer image, the disciplined athlete. Young men who decline the offer risk little in principle, but several focus group participants said that turning down a dip from an older hand on a first job felt like saying you did not belong.
The Organization of Work
The structure of work in ranching and the oilfield also shapes the behavior. Shifts on drilling and service rigs often run twelve hours or longer, with long drives before and after and weeks away from home. Many sites ban smoking because of fire risk, and moist snuff and pouches become the practical way to use nicotine on the job. Harvest and calving seasons bring long nights with little rest. In these settings nicotine is valued for staying alert, and the habit is learned from the older workers young men depend on for training and safety. No company in the county bans oral nicotine on site, and none offers cessation support. The workplace, in other words, is both a setting where the behavior is learned and a place where the institutional rules make one form of nicotine easier than another.
Sports Institutions
Baseball has a long association with smokeless tobacco, and high school and college teams remain an important setting. Institutional support matters: in a cluster-randomized trial of a spit tobacco intervention in 52 California colleges, athletes were less likely to start using smokeless tobacco when athletic trainers reported that the baseball coach supported prevention activities (Gansky et al., 2005). The county's high school prohibits tobacco on campus and at games, but coaches told the health department that enforcement on bus rides and at summer tournaments is difficult. Focus group athletes said pouches were easy to hide and that some players used them before games for a feeling of calm. The team, then, is a small institution whose norms, supervision and leaders can either protect or expose young men.
The Commercial Environment
The commercial environment determines which products are available, how they are priced and what images surround them. An updated scoping review reported that the U.S. pouch market grew more than threefold from 2021 to 2024, that marketing increasingly uses claims likely to appeal to young people and that online and social media channels are central to promotion (Travis et al., 2026). In the county, a health department audit of the eight stores selling tobacco found pouches displayed beside the register in seven, often next to energy drinks, while snuff was kept behind the counter. The pouch prototype of the clean, modern athlete described in Module 2 did not arise only among young men; it closely resembles the imagery used to sell the product.
How the Influences Interact
These influences reinforce one another. Networks carry the behavior from older to younger men; the cultural image of manhood makes accepting the offer feel like belonging; the organization of work provides the settings and the reasons; teams provide another setting with weak supervision; and the commercial environment supplies products designed to fit the settings and the images. Structural conditions also shape who is most exposed. Young men who go straight from high school to rig or ranch work enter the most intensive settings earliest, and they are also the least likely to have ongoing contact with school health programs or primary care.
What Individual Theories Miss
The prototype willingness model explains how a favorable image raises willingness, but it treats prototypes as mental images without asking where they come from. The sociological analysis supplies the answer: prototypes are drawn from real men in real networks and from commercial imagery, and they carry cultural meanings about manhood and work. Likewise, social cognitive theory's attention to modeling and environment is compatible with this analysis, but on its own it does not direct attention to the institutions, employers, teams and retailers, that set the rules. A health education response that addresses only individual beliefs will be working against forces that operate above the individual.
Implications for Health Education
The analysis suggests four directions. Network-based approaches could recruit respected older men, including crew leaders and coaches, to model quitting and to stop offering products to younger men. Messages should engage the valued image of a capable, independent working man rather than attack it, for example by framing dependence as a loss of control. Workplace partners could add oral nicotine to site tobacco policies and offer cessation support, and schools could strengthen supervision on team travel. At the community and policy levels, the health department could work with retailers on product placement and share its store audit with local officials. Module 4 will examine culture, values and norms more closely, and Module 5 will review the evidence on interventions.
Conclusion
Oral nicotine use among young men in this county is not only a set of individual decisions but a pattern produced by relationships, cultural expectations, working conditions, team institutions and commercial forces. Seeing those forces clarifies why individually focused education has limited reach and where a more complete strategy should intervene.
References
Christakis, N. A., & Fowler, J. H. (2008). The collective dynamics of smoking in a large social network. New England Journal of Medicine, 358(21), 2249-2258. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsa0706154
Courtenay, W. H. (2000). Constructions of masculinity and their influence on men's well-being: A theory of gender and health. Social Science & Medicine, 50(10), 1385-1401. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0277-9536(99)00390-1
Gansky, S. A., Ellison, J. A., Rudy, D., Bergert, N., Letendre, M. A., Nelson, L., Kavanagh, C., & Walsh, M. M. (2005). Cluster-randomized controlled trial of an athletic trainer-directed spit (smokeless) tobacco intervention for collegiate baseball athletes: Results after 1 year. Journal of Athletic Training, 40(2), 76-87.
Travis, N., Warner, K. E., Hartmann-Boyce, J., Goniewicz, M. L., Ma, C., Meza, R., & Levy, D. T. (2026). Oral nicotine pouches and public health: Evidence from an updated scoping review. Nicotine & Tobacco Research. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1093/ntr/ntag203
Reading the HLTH 6403 Module 3 instructions
Module 3 of HLTH 6403 typically moves from the individual to society. Prompts often ask you to analyze how social structures, relationships, institutions and cultural expectations influence a health behavior or decision, using sociological concepts and research. Some sections name concepts such as social networks, social capital, stigma or structural conditions; others ask you to choose. The strongest papers keep the behavior and population from earlier modules and show what an individual-level theory could not explain. Evidence is expected for each influence, and implications for health education should follow from the analysis. Check the prompt for a required number of influences, and note whether your instructor wants local data or published research alone.
How the HLTH 6403 Module 3 example is put together
An introduction explains what the individual theories from earlier modules left unanswered. Five sections then take one influence each: social networks, cultural expectations of men, the organization of work, sports institutions and the commercial environment. Each section cites research, flags when evidence comes from a related behavior and connects the evidence to local focus groups or a store audit. A section shows how the influences reinforce one another and who is most exposed. Another explains what the prototype willingness model and social cognitive theory miss without this analysis. Four implications for health education follow, and a short conclusion restates the paper's argument that the behavior is produced by social arrangements as much as by choices.
Where the points sit in the HLTH 6403 Module 3 rubric
Rubrics for this module generally reward analysis that goes beyond listing social factors. Graders tend to look for sociological concepts used accurately, research supporting each influence, attention to how influences interact and to who is most exposed, and a clear link back to the theories used earlier. Being careful about the limits of borrowed evidence shows judgment. Implications that reach institutions and policy, not only individuals, usually earn credit at the specialist level. A consistent case, clear headings and APA 7 citations for sociological theory and empirical studies complete a strong paper. Local evidence, such as a store audit or workplace policy review, often lifts the analysis above a literature summary.
Common HLTH 6403 Module 3 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Papers on social influences often become a list of factors with a sentence each. If you would like help choosing sociological concepts, finding evidence on networks, gender or institutions, or connecting these influences to the theory you applied earlier, a writer can take this on. Send the behavior, population and prompt, and a writer will put together a Module 3 analysis that explains how social forces shape the behavior and what that means for health education. If your instructor emphasizes a particular concept, such as stigma or social capital, we will build the analysis around it. We can also help you find local data, such as store audits or workplace policies, to ground the analysis.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HLTH 6403 and Ed.S. in Public Health Education sample papers
- HLTH 6403 Module 1: Behavior Change Theory Comparison
- HLTH 6403 Module 2: Theory Application
- HLTH 6403 Module 4: Culture and Norms Analysis
- HLTH 6403 Module 5: Intervention Research Review
- HLTH 6403 Module 6: Intervention Framework
- HLTH 6413 Module 6: Intervention Proposal
- HLTH 6483 Module 3: Outbreak Investigation Analysis
- HLTH 6483 Module 2: Health Disparity Analysis
- HLTH 6443 Module 4: Data Use and Security Protocols
HLTH 6403 Module 3 questions, answered
What does HLTH6403 Module 3 usually ask for?
In HLTH6403, Module 3 is typically where sociological influences on a health behavior get analyzed: networks, gender, work, institutions and markets, with evidence and implications.
What is the difference between a psychological and a sociological influence?
Psychological influences sit within the individual, such as beliefs and intentions; sociological influences come from relationships, institutions, cultural expectations and economic conditions.
How do social networks affect health behavior?
Behaviors can spread through ties among family, friends and coworkers, so people connected to users are more likely to use and people whose contacts quit are more likely to quit.
Where can I find a free HLTH 6403 Module 3 sample paper?
The complete Module 3 paper is here: an analysis of how crews, coaches, masculine ideals and stores shape dip and pouch habits across a composite county's young working men and athletes.
Can I use evidence about cigarettes for a paper on smokeless products?
Yes, if you say so and explain why the logic transfers; where direct evidence exists for your product, use it first.