| Course | HLTH 5413 Principles and Practice in Health Education |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Policy influences analysis |
| Length | 1,320 words, about 5 pages plus title and reference pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | American College of Education |
| Program | M.Ed. in Health and Wellness Education |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 5413 Module 2
The Bell, the Bus and the Budget: How School Start Time Policy and Other Political Decisions Shape Adolescent Sleep
Student Name
American College of Education
HLTH5413: Principles and Practice in Health Education
Module 2 Assignment
Instructor Name
October 12, 2026
Introduction
Module 1 of this project showed that short sleep among students at a composite working-class suburban high school results from interacting factors: the pubertal shift in sleep timing, after-school jobs, crowded housing, late social media use and a first bell at 7:05 a.m. Several of those factors are set not by students or families but by public decisions. This paper examines the political and policy influences on adolescent sleep: who decides when school starts, why, what the evidence says about changing it and what other policies shape the hours available for sleep. Politics here means the process by which school boards, legislatures and other bodies weigh competing interests and allocate resources.
School Start Times as Policy
School start times are set by local school boards, usually on the recommendation of administrators, and they reflect transportation budgets, athletic schedules, teacher contracts and families' child care needs more than students' sleep. In the composite district, the high school begins at 7:05 a.m. because one fleet of buses makes three rounds each morning, carrying high school students on the first round, followed by middle and elementary schools. The American Academy of Pediatrics has urged middle and high schools to hold the first bell until half past eight or later, citing evidence that early bells are among the few causes of teenage sleep loss a community can actually change and that delaying start times can improve physical and mental health, safety and academic performance (Adolescent Sleep Working Group et al., 2014). The district's schedule falls well short of that recommendation, as do those of many districts nationwide.
What Happens When Start Times Change
The evidence from districts that have changed start times is encouraging. Owens et al. (2010) studied an independent high school in Rhode Island that delayed its start from 8:00 to 8:30 a.m. After the change, students' average school-night sleep increased by 45 minutes, the share sleeping at least 8 hours rose from 16.4% to 54.7%, and daytime sleepiness, fatigue and depressed mood declined, while health center visits for fatigue and class attendance improved. The study used surveys before and after the change without a comparison school, so other factors could have contributed, but the size of the changes is notable.
Dunster et al. (2018) examined the Seattle School District's decision to move secondary school start times nearly an hour later, using wrist monitors to measure sleep objectively before and after the change. Median daily sleep increased by 34 minutes, and the change was associated with a 4.5% increase in median grades and better attendance. Students did not simply go to bed later, which had been a common objection. Together, these studies suggest that start time policy can produce gains that no classroom lesson on sleep habits could match.
The Politics of Change
If the evidence is strong, why do early start times persist? The answer lies in competing interests. A later high school start usually means reorganizing bus tiers, which may cost money or push elementary schools earlier, a change some parents of young children oppose. Later dismissal can affect after-school jobs, sports practices and games against schools on different schedules, and coaches and athletic directors are often vocal. Teachers' contracts, child care arrangements for families who rely on older siblings to supervise younger ones after school and the use of shared facilities all complicate the change. Those who benefit most, teenagers, have the least political voice.
States have begun to act where districts would not. California became the first state to set a limit in law, so that from the 2022-2023 school year most public high schools may not open their day before 8:30 in the morning and middle schools not before 8:00 (S.B. 328, 2019). State action shifts the political question from whether to change to how, and it spreads the costs of change across districts rather than leaving each board to fight the same battle.
Other Policies That Shape Sleep
Start times are not the only policy lever. Federal child labor rules limit the hours that 14- and 15-year-olds may work during the school year, including how late in the evening, but they set no hour limits for 16- and 17-year-olds, leaving those decisions to states and employers. In the composite community, most working students are 16 or older, so closing shifts ending at 10 or 11 p.m. on school nights are legal. State athletic associations set rules for practice length and game schedules that determine how late athletes get home. District homework policies, where they exist, rarely consider total workload across courses. Even housing policy plays a role, since the availability of affordable family housing affects whether siblings must share bedrooms. Each of these policies is made for its own reasons, but together they shape the hours teenagers have for sleep.
Economic Politics: Who Pays
Every sleep-related policy involves a decision about who bears costs. Keeping early start times saves transportation money for the district but transfers costs to students in lost sleep and to society through the health, safety and academic consequences documented in earlier research. Delaying start times may cost the district money for buses or require other schedule changes, but it returns benefits in health and learning. Limiting teen work hours protects sleep but may cost families income they rely on. Recognizing these trade-offs is essential for health educators who advocate policy change, because opponents often raise legitimate concerns that must be answered rather than dismissed.
Options Within the District's Reach
The composite district does not need to wait for a state law. District transportation staff have identified three options. The first would reverse the bus tiers so that elementary schools start first, which would move the high school to about 8:20 a.m. at little added cost but would require elementary families to adjust, and some would need earlier child care. The second would add buses so that high school and middle school routes run at the same time, allowing an 8:30 start for both at an estimated cost of several hundred thousand dollars a year. The third, a smaller step, would move the first bell to 7:45 a.m. by shortening routes and consolidating stops. Each option has winners and losers, and each would need board approval after public comment. Presenting these options with their costs and likely benefits, rather than a single demand, gives the board a realistic path and shows opponents that their concerns have been heard.
The Health Educator's Role in Policy
Health education is not only classroom teaching. The profession's responsibilities include advocacy for policies that support health, and school health educators are well placed to contribute. In the composite district, a health educator could present local sleep survey data to the school board, organize students to describe the effects of early start times in their own words, work with pediatricians and the school nurse to explain the evidence and help build a coalition of parents, teachers and coaches. The educator could also examine the transportation budget with district staff to identify workable options, such as changing tier order or adjusting routes. Advocacy must remain honest about the evidence and respectful of opponents, questions that Module 4 will explore as ethical issues.
Conclusion
The political and policy environment sets the boundaries within which teenagers make nightly choices about sleep. School start times are the most powerful lever, and evidence from Rhode Island and Seattle shows that later starts can add substantial sleep and improve mood, attendance and grades. Yet early starts persist because transportation budgets, athletics, child care and work schedules create interests that resist change, while teenagers have little political voice. State action, as in California, can shift that balance. Child labor rules, athletic schedules and homework policies add further constraints. Module 3 will identify the barriers these policies create and match them with strategies.
References
Adolescent Sleep Working Group, Committee on Adolescence, & Council on School Health. (2014). School start times for adolescents. Pediatrics, 134(3), 642-649. https://doi.org/10.1542/peds.2014-1697
Dunster, G. P., de la Iglesia, L., Ben-Hamo, M., Nave, C., Fleischer, J. G., Panda, S., & de la Iglesia, H. O. (2018). Sleepmore in Seattle: Later school start times are associated with more sleep and better performance in high school students. Science Advances, 4(12), eaau6200. https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aau6200
Owens, J. A., Belon, K., & Moss, P. (2010). Impact of delaying school start time on adolescent sleep, mood, and behavior. Archives of Pediatrics & Adolescent Medicine, 164(7), 608-614. https://doi.org/10.1001/archpediatrics.2010.96
S.B. 328, 2019 Cal. Stat. ch. 868 (2019).
HLTH 5413 Module 2 instructions, in plain terms
Module 2 of HLTH 5413 commonly turns from individual and social factors to politics and policy. Prompts usually ask you to identify the policies and political decisions that influence your chosen lifestyle issue, explain who makes them and why, examine evidence about their effects and consider how health educators can influence them. Look at every level that applies: school or workplace rules, local government, state law and federal regulation. Include the interests that support and oppose change, since policy rarely turns on evidence alone. Keep the issue and population from your first module. Check Canvas for whether a specific policy must be analyzed in depth and whether advocacy recommendations are expected. A short table of policies, decision makers and effects can help organize the analysis.
Inside the HLTH 5413 Module 2 example
The example begins with the composite district's 7:05 a.m. start and explains how a tiered bus system produced it. It summarizes the pediatric recommendation and two studies of start time changes, then analyzes the politics that keep early starts in place and the state law that changed the question in California. A section lays out three options the district could adopt on its own. Further sections examine child labor rules, athletic schedules and homework policies and ask who pays the costs of each choice. The paper ends by describing what a health educator could do to advance policy change, with ethical questions left for a later module.
Where the points sit in the HLTH 5413 Module 2 rubric
Graders typically look for accurate identification of the policies involved, including who holds authority to change them. Evidence about policy effects should be summarized with attention to study design and limitations. The strongest papers analyze competing interests fairly, naming each group's concern and its source, rather than portraying opponents as uninformed. Showing how policies at different levels combine, and who bears their costs, reflects the course's emphasis on determinants. A realistic role for the health educator in advocacy, and APA 7 citations for studies, recommendations and laws, complete a strong paper. Local options with realistic costs make a policy discussion practical rather than theoretical.
HLTH 5413 Module 2 help from the desk
Policy analysis can feel distant from health education until you see how school rules and laws set the limits on behavior. If you are unsure which policies matter for your issue, how to find evidence of their effects or how to present the politics fairly, we can help. Send your Module 1 paper and the assignment wording, and we will write a Module 2 analysis that names the decision makers, weighs the evidence, treats opposing interests fairly and shows where a health educator can make a difference. If your issue involves a workplace or community policy rather than a school, the same approach works.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HLTH 5413 and M.Ed. in Health and Wellness Education sample papers
- HLTH 5413 Module 1: Determinants Analysis
- HLTH 5413 Module 3: Barriers and Strategies
- HLTH 5413 Module 4: Ethics Analysis
- HLTH 5413 Module 5: Intervention Plan
- HLTH 5403 Module 3: Behavior Theory Application
- HLTH 5423 Module 5: Age-Appropriate Education Plan
- HLTH 5403 Module 5: Culturally Responsive Strategies
- HLTH 5493 Module 2: Evidence-Based Program Selection
HLTH 5413 Module 2 questions, answered
What does HLTH5413 Module 2 usually ask for?
In HLTH5413, the second module generally asks you to analyze how political decisions and policies at the school, local, state or federal level shape the lifestyle issue you chose, including who decides, why and with what effect.
Why do many high schools start before 8:30 a.m.?
Start times usually reflect bus budgets, athletic schedules, contracts and child care needs; tiered bus systems often send high school routes first to save money.
Do later school start times increase sleep?
Studies of schools that delayed start times, including a Rhode Island high school and the Seattle district, found that students slept more and showed improvements in mood, attendance or grades.
Where can I find a free HLTH 5413 Module 2 sample paper?
This page holds a whole Module 2 policy analysis explaining how school start times, bus budgets, state law, child labor rules, athletics and homework shape adolescent sleep, with the evidence and the politics of change.
Can health educators advocate for policy change?
Yes. Advocacy is part of the profession's responsibilities, carried out honestly, with evidence and with respect for competing interests.