| Course | HLTH 5403 Behavioral Practices in Health Education |
|---|---|
| Module | Module 2 |
| Paper type | Social norms and peer influence analysis |
| Length | 1,300 words, about 5 pages plus title and reference pages |
| Format | APA 7 student paper |
| School | American College of Education |
| Program | M.Ed. in Health and Wellness Education |
| Updated | September 2026 |
Free sample paper for HLTH 5403 Module 2
Everyone Is Getting Tan: Descriptive Norms, Injunctive Norms and Peer Influence on Tanning Among Rural High School Girls
Student Name
American College of Education
HLTH5403: Behavioral Practices in Health Education
Module 2 Assignment
Instructor Name
October 12, 2026
Introduction
Module 1 of this project found that tanning among girls at a composite rural Midwestern high school carries cultural meaning, signaling health, beauty and belonging, and is supported by family traditions and rural routines. This paper narrows the focus to the social world of the girls themselves. Adolescence is a period in which the opinions and behavior of peers carry unusual weight, and tanning is a visible behavior, easy to notice and compare. The question here is how social norms and peer influence shape the decision to tan and the decision not to use sun protection.
Two Kinds of Norms
Cialdini et al. (1990) distinguished two kinds of social norms. Descriptive norms describe what most people actually do, and they influence behavior by signaling what is typical and likely to work. Injunctive norms describe what most people approve or disapprove of, and they influence behavior through expected social rewards and punishments. The two can point in different directions: a student may believe most classmates disapprove of tanning beds but also see that many classmates use them. Cialdini and colleagues also showed that norms influence behavior most when they are brought to mind, that is, when a situation makes them noticeable.
For tanning, both kinds of norms operate. Tanned skin is on display every day in late spring and summer, so the descriptive norm is highly visible. Compliments, teasing and social media reactions express the injunctive norm. The rest of this paper examines each source of influence in turn.
What Girls See Their Peers Doing
In the composite school, the descriptive norm for tanning is reinforced by events. Before prom and homecoming, groups of friends book salon sessions together, and the results are visible in photographs posted the same night. On sports teams that practice outdoors, most players arrive with tans by midseason, and few reapply sunscreen during practices or tournaments. Among the small group of juniors interviewed by the health educator, several described feeling out of place when they were pale at the first pool party of the summer.
Holman and Watson (2013), in their review of studies of U.S. adolescents, found that having friends who tan was one of the social factors most consistently linked to intentional tanning. The finding fits a simple mechanism: when tanning is what peers do, it seems normal, safe and expected, and not tanning can feel like a statement.
What Girls Think Their Peers Approve
The injunctive norm is expressed through comments and reactions. Girls reported that friends compliment a tan, saying that someone looks healthy or glowing, and that paleness sometimes draws teasing. On social media, photos showing tanned skin receive more likes and comments. Sunscreen use carries little social reward and sometimes mild ridicule, especially thick or white sunscreen on the face. Boys' comments also matter, and several girls said that boys in their class preferred tanned skin, although none had asked them directly.
These perceptions of approval are powerful precisely because they are rarely checked. A girl who believes her friends expect a tan acts accordingly, whether or not they do.
When Norms Are Misperceived
Research on student drinking offers a useful lesson. Perkins and Berkowitz (1986), surveying college students about alcohol, found that students believed their peers held more permissive attitudes toward drinking than the peers actually reported. That gap between perceived and actual norms led to social norms campaigns that correct misperceptions by publicizing accurate data.
A similar gap appears in the composite school. On the student health survey, girls estimated that about 70% of girls in their grade had tried to tan in the past year; the actual figure was about 40%. They also estimated that most classmates disliked sunscreen, while half of the girls surveyed agreed that wearing sunscreen was a smart thing to do. If girls overestimate how many peers tan and underestimate how many approve of protection, some are conforming to a norm that is weaker than they think. That finding creates an opportunity for education, discussed below.
Family and Adult Norms
Peers are not the only reference group. The same review linked adolescent tanning to parents' own tanning and to parental permission (Holman & Watson, 2013). In the composite community, some mothers tan and some pay for salon packages as gifts before prom, while coaches rarely mention sun protection. Adult behavior signals both a descriptive norm, adults do it, and an injunctive norm, adults approve. Where parents and coaches model protection, by wearing hats, providing shade or bringing sunscreen, girls reported that it felt more acceptable to do the same.
Phones, Media and Online Peers
Much peer influence now happens online. Using a national survey of adolescents, Niu et al. (2018) found that girls and non-Hispanic white adolescents had higher odds of frequent intentional outdoor tanning and that more time spent on cell phones was associated with both outdoor and indoor tanning. A single-wave survey like this one leaves open whether phones drive tanning or the reverse, but it fits what students describe: a steady stream of images of tanned friends, influencers and celebrities, along with tanning tips and product promotions. Online, the descriptive norm is exaggerated, because people post their best photos, and the injunctive norm is quantified in likes.
Norms Around Protection Itself
Norms apply not only to tanning but to the protective behaviors that could replace it, and in this school those norms are weak or negative. Sunscreen is associated with younger children, beach vacations and parents who fuss, not with teenagers going about ordinary summer days. Hats are acceptable for boys on the ballfield but rarely worn by girls outside of practice. Long sleeves in hot weather are considered strange. Several interviewed students said that applying sunscreen in front of friends felt awkward, as though it signaled worry or vanity, and that they would do it more readily if everyone did. That observation captures a central point of norms research: a behavior that feels odd when done alone can become ordinary when done together. It also suggests that the goal of health education is not only to reduce a risky norm but to build a protective one, by making protection visible, shared and socially rewarded. Sunscreen dispensers at the pool, team-branded hats and a quick group application before games are small changes that could shift what looks typical.
Group Dynamics
Friend groups and teams develop their own shared standards, and members who deviate may feel pressure to conform. In small rural schools, where students may have known one another since kindergarten and social groups overlap across classes, teams and churches, those standards spread quickly and are hard to escape. At the same time, groups can change quickly when a respected member changes. The girl described in Module 1 whose aunt had melanoma stopped tanning, and her friends noticed; two of them reported using sunscreen more often afterward. Influential peers can move a group's norm in either direction.
Implications for Health Education
These findings suggest several approaches. First, correct misperceived norms by sharing accurate local data, for example that most girls in the school did not use a tanning bed last year and that half think sunscreen is smart. Second, make protective norms visible by having teams and coaches build sunscreen and shade into practice routines, so that protection becomes what the group does. Third, enlist respected peers, such as team captains, to model and talk about protection. Fourth, involve parents, since their behavior and permission shape both kinds of norms. Finally, address social media directly by teaching students how posted images distort perceptions of what is typical. Module 3 will apply a behavior theory to show how these norms combine with attitudes and perceived control to shape the decision to tan.
References
Cialdini, R. B., Reno, R. R., & Kallgren, C. A. (1990). A focus theory of normative conduct: Recycling the concept of norms to reduce littering in public places. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(6), 1015-1026. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.6.1015
Holman, D. M., & Watson, M. (2013). Correlates of intentional tanning among adolescents in the United States: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Adolescent Health, 52(5), S52-S59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.09.021
Niu, Z., Parmar, V., Xu, B., Coups, E. J., & Stapleton, J. L. (2018). Prevalence and correlates of intentional outdoor and indoor tanning among adolescents in the United States: Findings from the FLASHE survey. Preventive Medicine Reports, 11, 187-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.06.014
Perkins, H. W., & Berkowitz, A. D. (1986). Perceiving the community norms of alcohol use among students: Some research implications for campus alcohol education programming. International Journal of the Addictions, 21(9-10), 961-976. https://doi.org/10.3109/10826088609077249
Reading the HLTH 5403 Module 2 instructions
The second HLTH 5403 module typically focuses on the social side of behavior. Prompts often ask you to examine how social norms, peer influence and group dynamics shape the behavior you chose, and to use course concepts such as descriptive and injunctive norms, conformity and reference groups. Some sections ask you to compare the weight of peer, family and media influences. Use evidence about your specific group, such as survey data or published studies of similar populations, and explain the mechanism by which each influence works. If your course carries one behavior across modules, build on your Module 1 analysis. Check Canvas for the expected length, the number of sources and whether local data may be included.
How the HLTH 5403 Module 2 example is put together
The example defines descriptive and injunctive norms, then applies each to tanning: group salon trips and team practices show what peers do, while compliments, teasing and likes show what they approve. A section on misperceived norms compares girls' estimates with actual survey figures. Family and coach norms, phone-based influence and small-school group dynamics follow, including an example of one respected student shifting her friends' behavior. The paper closes with five strategies drawn directly from the analysis, preparing for the behavior theory in Module 3. A separate section shows that sunscreen, hats and long sleeves carry social meanings of their own, so the goal includes building a protective norm.
Where the points sit in the HLTH 5403 Module 2 rubric
Rubrics for this module generally reward precise use of norm concepts rather than loose talk about peer pressure. Graders look for evidence about the group and a clear explanation of how each influence changes behavior. Distinguishing peers, family and media shows depth, and explaining which of them matters most for your group shows judgment. Attention to misperceived norms or group dynamics often separates stronger papers, particularly when local figures show the gap between what students believe and what their peers actually report. Implications should follow from the analysis and be practical for a health educator. Findings from cross-sectional surveys should be described as associations, and the reference list should follow APA 7.
Common HLTH 5403 Module 2 mistakes, and how to avoid them
Many students find this module easy to start and hard to finish, because peer pressure is familiar but norm concepts are precise. If you are unsure how to separate descriptive from injunctive norms, find evidence for your group or turn the analysis into strategies, we can help. Send the behavior, setting and group from your Module 1 paper along with the prompt, and our team can prepare a Module 2 analysis that applies norm concepts accurately and leads to strategies a health educator could use in your setting. Every claim about your group will rest on data or published research rather than impressions.
Write yours, or have the desk draft it
This paper is an original model document written by our desk, not a submitted student paper and not an official American College of Education document. Read it for the moves, then write your own to the instructions in your classroom. If you want one built to your exact prompt and rubric, the first custom sample is free and arrives in 24 to 48 hours.
More HLTH 5403 and M.Ed. in Health and Wellness Education sample papers
- HLTH 5403 Module 1: Culture and Behavior Analysis
- HLTH 5403 Module 3: Behavior Theory Application
- HLTH 5403 Module 4: Risk Perception Analysis
- HLTH 5403 Module 5: Culturally Responsive Strategies
- HLTH 5443 Module 2: Health Informatics Analysis
- HLTH 5433 Module 2: Data-Informed Decision
- HLTH 5091 Module 5: Capstone and Professional Plan
- HLTH 5493 Module 4: Implementation Plan
HLTH 5403 Module 2 questions, answered
What does HLTH5403 Module 2 usually ask for?
The second HLTH5403 module commonly asks you to analyze how social norms and peer influence shape a health behavior in a defined group, using concepts such as descriptive and injunctive norms and evidence about the group.
What is the difference between descriptive and injunctive norms?
Descriptive norms are what people think most others do; injunctive norms are what people think most others approve. Both shape behavior, and they can point in different directions.
What is a social norms approach?
An approach that corrects exaggerated beliefs about how common a risky behavior is by sharing accurate data about what peers actually do and think.
Where can I find a free HLTH 5403 Module 2 sample paper?
This page presents a full Module 2 paper on how visible tanning, peer approval, misperceived norms, parents, teams and phone-based networks keep tanning popular in one small-town Midwestern school.
Can adults be part of a social norms analysis?
Yes. Parents, coaches and teachers model behavior and signal approval, so their norms often matter as much as peers'.